HackerPapers

HN 二十年,最值得读的论文。

从 Hacker News 2006 年以来的全部投稿里,挑出链接本身就是论文的帖子:arXiv、期刊、会议论文、技术报告。每篇附中文标题,讨论最热的那些再加上中文导读和高赞评论翻译。

从必读开始
  • 8,000+篇被 HN 讨论过的论文

Essential

必读 30 篇

在论文库里看全部精选

编辑精选里 HN 讨论最热的 30 篇,每篇都有中文导读。不知道从哪读起,就从这里开始。

  1. 正在载入论文…

Archive

论文库

点柱子按年份筛选。注:源数据里 2023 年的帖子分数记录不全,2026 年尚未过完,这两年收录偏少。

难度
排序

    About

    这些论文是怎么挑出来的

    1. 01

      全量扫一遍

      读取 Hacker News 自 2006 年以来的全部 446 万条链接投稿,找出指向 arXiv、期刊、会议、技术报告和学术 PDF 的帖子。

    2. 02

      只留论文本身

      由 AI 逐条判断,剔除介绍论文的新闻、博客和幻灯片,同一篇论文的多次投稿合并计算,并统计它在评论区被引用的次数。

    3. 03

      写导读、译评论

      讨论最热的 1,500 篇配上中文导读,并精选、翻译 HN 高赞评论。导读由 AI 生成,可能有误,请以原文为准。

    生物与医学2022ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

    儿童期抗生素使用是克罗恩病的风险因素:队列研究

    Childhood antibiotics as a risk factor for Crohn's disease: Cohort study

    入门 · 约 35 分钟读完前置知识:流行病学基础、肠道菌群概念

    读论文 HN 讨论
    211HN 得分
    155条评论

    导读

    这项队列研究探讨儿童期使用抗生素是否增加日后患克罗恩病(Crohn's disease)的风险。研究汇总了包括中国和澳大利亚在内的多个人群数据,发现18岁前使用抗生素在中国人群中与克罗恩病发病显著相关(校正OR约4.8),但在澳大利亚人群中未观察到显著关联。

    HN 关注点:抗生素对肠道菌群的长期影响是 HN 读者长期关注的话题,讨论焦点集中在研究结果是否稳健以及医生滥用抗生素的问题。

    关键词 克罗恩病抗生素肠道菌群流行病学

    HN 评论精选

    这几条评论里:质疑 1 补充 1 亲历 2

    质疑质疑结论稳健性:亚组间结果不一致说明发现可能不可靠

    一方面我觉得儿童期抗生素扰乱消化道免疫系统完全说得通;但另一方面,亚组分析显示抗生素使用在18岁以下是中国人群的克罗恩病风险因素(校正OR 4.80, 95% CI 1.62–12.24; P=0.005),在澳大利亚人群中却不显著(OR 1.80, 95% CI 0.33–9.95; P=0.498)。如果这是一个可靠的发现,就不应该在亚组分析中崩塌。

    rossdavidh查看英文原文

    On the one hand, it makes total sense to me that childhood antibiotics could mess up your digestive tract immune system. On the other hand: "Subgroup analysis showed that antibiotic use <18 years old was a risk factor for CD development in the Chinese (adjusted OR 4.80, 95% CI 1.62–12.24; P = 0.005) but not in Australian populations (OR 1.80, 95% CI 0.33–9.95; P = 0.498)." If it were a robust finding, it would not fall apart on subgroup analysis.

    亲历亲历:医生普遍低估抗生素风险,不良反应上报和告知严重缺失

    医疗体系需要彻底改革,很多医生完全不了解抗生素等药物的风险。有研究发现只有7%的医生上报过不良反应,有的害怕、有的不会、有的没时间,有的医生执业近一生从未上报。我16到22岁时因痤疮多次服用6个月以上的多西环素疗程,多位皮肤科医生都说囊肿性痤疮无药可治。后来我厌倦了多西环素的糟糕感觉,自己研究护肤,只要用温和洁面产品每天两次、保湿、不碰脸,囊肿性痤疮就完全消失——但没有任何医生告诉过我这些。之后我对环丙沙星产生不良反应,40多位医生无视之,说是我心理问题,后来FDA才加了永久性神经损伤的警告。我至今仍要给医生寄研究文献,因为他们还说我错了。我协助管理一个氟喹诺酮毒性群组,每天都有人因疑似感染被开了这些本应是最后手段的药,这近乎医疗事故。

    codeTired查看英文原文

    The healthcare needs to be completely overhauled. So many doctors are completely ignorant of risks of antibiotics and other meds. There was a study that found 7% of doctors reported adverse reactions. Some were scared, some didn’t know how, some didn’t have time. Some doctors made no reports in nearly lifetime of practice. When I was 16-22 I had multiple 6+ months courses of doxycycline for acne. I have seen multiple dermatologist who said nothing can be done about my cystic acne. At some point I was tired of doxy making me feel awful so I researched different skin types and skin care routines. As long as I use a mild soap twice a day, use a moisturizer and don’t touch my skin I get 0 cystic acne but it took weeks to see the results. No doctor ever told me about different types of skin and I was young and dumb. My parents didn’t know any better. And internet wasn’t as popular back then. Then, I got an adverse reaction to cipro. And 40+ doctors ignored it. Told me it’s all in my head. Told me to seek help for my mental health and depression. Later FDA added warning about permanent nerve damage. I still have to send studies to doctors because they try to tell me I’m wrong, after I had every test under the sun to rule out other causes. I help admin flouroquinolone toxicity group and every day we get individuals who were given these last resort meds for suspected infection. It is border line medical malpractice. However, I have seen that it is impossible to find a lawyer to take the case and find a physician willing to testify. There needs to be a better system for tracking allergic reactions and trends. For example, cipro might show no reaction up to 6 months. Then, you snap your Achilles. The doctor won’t tell you it was cipro unless you tell him. It’s fucked and extremely underreported.

    补充科普:抗生素造成的菌群损失(如关键菌种)可能永久且难以修复

    抗生素的实际伤害比我们意识到的更大。西方人的消化道菌群与不使用抗生素治疗的人群有显著差异,一些丢失的物种非常重要,而我们目前无法修复:比如对能量代谢至关重要的 Faecalibacterium prausnitzii 无法在有氧环境中存活,一旦被杀死可能永远消失。又如 Limosilactobacillus reuteri 能抑制真菌和其他细菌在小肠定植,但它对抗生素非常敏感,如今只有约5%的人还携带。我们并不知道理想菌群是什么样,只知道西方大多数人的菌群不健康、缺少关键物种,而我们的理解才刚起步。

    PaulKeeble查看英文原文

    Antibiotics are actually really more damaging than we realise. Western digestive tracts show significant differences in microbiome that those of people who do not use antibiotics as treatment and some of the lost species are really important. We also have no way to fix it currently, some of the species like Faecalibacterium Prausnitzii are critical to our bodies energy system but can't survive in oxygen, so we have no way to eat it at all, you kill it then its gone likely for good. Others like Limosilactobacillus reuteri stop fungus from inhabiting our small intestine as well as other bacteria but just 5% of us still have some of it as its very susceptible to antibiotics. We don't know what ideal microbiomes look like, we just know the bulk of people living in the western world have unhealthy ones that are missing key species and we have only scratched the surface of understanding.

    亲历亲历分享:罗伊氏乳杆菌益生菌改善了其肠道问题,并附相关研究

    我曾在巴拿马一个热带岛屿因饮水患上严重肠易激综合征,痛苦了好几年,连医生朋友都说只能硬扛。直到我发现罗伊氏乳杆菌(L. Reuteri),据说这种菌在1950年代加工食品流行前更常见,它彻底改变了我的生活。它会分泌一种叫 Reuterin 的物质,抑制其他更有害细菌的生长。我无法亲身体会克罗恩病那种程度的痛苦,但确实有关于它对该病有效的研究。

    jamal-kumar查看英文原文

    I had really bad IBS from consuming water on a tropical island in Panama one time and suffered for a few years with even my doctor friend telling me "Damn that sucks, not much you can do except manage". Pretty horrible symptoms until I discovered L. Reuteri. [1] I read that it's been a bacteria that was more commonly found in samples until around the 1950s when people started consuming more garbage processed food and was sold. Simply stated, it changed my life. It emits a substance called Reuterin which inhibits the growth of other more harmful bacterial species. [2] I can't speak personally for suffering on the level of Crohn's disease, but there's positive research out there regarding it. [3] [4] [1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5917019/ [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reuterin [3] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7270012/ [4] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7468961/

    历次讨论

    同领域还值得读

    1. CRISPR 在活体动物中消除 HIV-1 感染

      CRISPR eliminates HIV-1 infection in live animals

      报告利用 CRISPR/Cas9 基因编辑技术在活体动物中清除 HIV-1 感染:研究人员通过腺病毒载体递送特定的 Cas9 系统,从被感染细胞中切除嵌入的 HIV 病毒 DNA。

      生物与医学2017 · 1,455 分 · 239 评入门 · 约 30 分钟编辑精选
    2. 保护区飞行昆虫生物量27年下降75%

      75% decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas

      这篇发表于 PLOS ONE 的研究通过在德国保护区长达 27 年的昆虫生物量监测,发现飞行昆虫总量下降了约 75%。

      生物与医学2017 · 901 分 · 432 评入门 · 约 45 分钟编辑精选
    3. 为什么大多数已发表的研究发现是错的

      Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)

      这篇 2005 年发表于 PLOS Medicine 的经典论文由 John Ioannidis 撰写,论证了在统计功效不足、研究偏倚和多重检验等因素下,大多数已发表的医学研究发…

      生物与医学2022 · 388 分 · 351 评入门 · 约 60 分钟编辑精选
    4. 人类免疫系统的物理接线图

      A physical wiring diagram for the human immune system

      这篇 Nature 论文系统绘制了人类免疫系统的“物理接线图”:通过大规模实验鉴定免疫细胞表面受体之间的相互作用(包括约 30 种此前未知的受体互作),并结合定量计算模型模拟免疫…

      生物与医学2022 · 342 分 · 49 评专业 · 约 90 分钟编辑精选
    5. 脂肪组织在减重后仍保留肥胖的表观遗传记忆

      Adipose tissue retains an epigenetic memory of obesity after weight loss

      这篇 Nature 论文研究了肥胖对脂肪组织的长期影响:即使减重成功,脂肪细胞仍保留着肥胖时期的表观遗传记忆,可能解释为什么减重后容易反弹。

      生物与医学2025 · 263 分 · 327 评进阶 · 约 45 分钟编辑精选

    打赏支持

    打赏二维码

    觉得有用,请作者喝杯咖啡。

    WeChat

    关注向阳乔木

    微信公众号「向阳乔木推荐看」

    微信公众号「向阳乔木推荐看」二维码

    微信扫一扫;在微信里打开本页时,长按二维码识别。