经济与社会科学2022scholar.princeton.edu
开口求助令人痛苦
It Hurts to Ask
进阶 · 约 60 分钟读完前置知识：博弈论基础、行为经济学、社会心理学
导读
这篇论文研究人们为什么在需要帮助时不愿开口（ask-shyness），以及这种不求助如何与帮助者的意愿相互作用。评论引用的摘要指出，即使大多数帮助者得知需求后愿意帮忙，不开口仍会发生；更大的需求虽让帮助更有价值，却可能反而降低求助倾向；潜在帮助者也可能因担心对方羞于开口而主动提议。评论还提到论文用 Receivers 和 Senders 分别指求助者与帮助者。
HN 关注点：是因为求助的心理成本直接影响职场提问文化、导师制和协作效率，也引出个人关系与组织机制如何分工的问题。
HN 评论精选
这几条评论里：质疑 1 补充 2 亲历 1
亲历亲历：明确且反复鼓励公开提问能降低心理门槛，投入小收益大。
就我个人经历而言，我刚到现在的公司时，上级明确告诉我应该多问问题、不要犹豫。他们说要在公共工程 Slack 频道里问（远程办公），这样所有人都能看到、有更多人帮忙回答，也方便以后搜索。体验非常好，我把很大一部分归功于老板建立起来的提问文化。后来越来越多工程师加入，包括实习生，我确保他们听到和我一样的话，并觉得可以放心问任何问题。我很喜欢这种理念，但发现只说一次不够，否则人们（尤其年轻工程师）有时还是会有点怯。我在指导和入职会议里会反复说到可能让人烦的程度，但大家会很开放地提问，我对此很高兴。回答提问会占用每个人一点额外时间，但你用导师和新人各 10 分钟的两块时间给某人解除阻塞，能为新人节省数小时；如果对方没有完全理解情况，这还会在未来情境中复利。我非常欣赏提问友好的文化，再也不想在不是这样的地方工作。
jjice查看英文原文
Anecdotally, when I started at my current job, it was made clear to me that I should ask questions and not think twice about it. They said to ask in our public engineering slack channel (remote work) so everyone could see and have more eyes on it for answers plus future searching. It was such a great experience, and I put a lot of that on the culture of questions my boss put into place. When we had more and more engineers join, including interns, I made sure they heard the same thing I did and felt comfortable asking any questions. I really love this philosophy, but I found out that you can't just say it once or else people are still a bit skittish sometimes (young engineers mostly). I will repeat it to the point where it's likely annoying during mentoring and onboarding meetings, but people will be very open with their questions, which I'm very happy with. It takes a bit of extra time out of everyone's day to respond to questions, but you're unblocking someone in 2 chunks of 10 minutes (mentor and mentee) which saves the mentee upwards of hours, and this can compound with future situations if they don't have a complete understanding of the situation. I really appreciate a question friendly culture and I would never want to work at a place that isn't like that again.
补充用文学引文说明高风险的请求常需中间人试探、避免明确承诺以防被拒受辱。
外交是一种高风险的请求。‘Herapath 先生，我明白你想去捕鲸船，我允许你去。你无疑知道美英之间敌意很深，而且很不幸 Leopard 号是部分原因：这就是为什么我认为最好禁止通常的登船拜访，以防任何争吵。你也知道 Leopard 号的情况：用一天锻炉和合适工具就能出海而不是在这里过冬。捕鲸船肯定有锻炉，但作为绅士你会理解，我极不愿向美国船长开口求人情，极不愿让舰队或我自己遭到拒绝。我还要说，他同样不愿来求我，我因此尊敬他。不过，仔细想想，他也许愿意用锻炉换我们的医疗服务。你可以向他说明情况，但不要让我们承诺任何具体请求——听着，Herapath 先生，无论如何别让我们受辱。如果结果是他愿意交换，那我会非常感激你。非常感激，因为我更不愿使用武力。’
cjcole查看英文原文
Diplomacy is a species of high-stakes asking. 'Mr Herapath, I understand that you wish to visit the whaler, and you have my permission to go. You are no doubt aware that there is a great deal of ill-feeling between the United States and England, and that most unhappily the Leopard was the cause of some of it: that is why I thought best to forbid the usual ship-visiting, to prevent quarrelling of any kind. You also know the Leopard's condition: one day's use of a forge and the proper tools would enable her to put to sea rather than winter here. The whaler certainly possesses a forge, but as a gentleman you will understand that I am extremely reluctant to ask a favour of the American skipper, extremely reluctant to expose the service or myself to a rebuff. I may add that he is equally reluctant to come a-begging to me, and I honour him for it. However, on reflection he may feel inclined to exchange the use of his forge for our medical services. You may give him a view of the situation, but without committing us to any specific request - harkee, Mr Herapath, don't you expose us to an affront, whatever you do. And if it should turn out that he would like the exchange, why, I should be very much obliged to you. Very much obliged indeed, for I should be even more reluctant to use force.'
质疑质疑论文忽略请求者/被请求者比例和规模效应；组织或社会问题需要制度方案而非个人关系。
我扫了一遍，没怎么找到关于请求者与被请求者比例（论文似乎称为 Receivers 和 Senders）的讨论。这似乎是个主要因素——经典例子是 IT 人员不断被要求帮忙处理相对基础的任务。如果这就是其定义的工作，那没问题；但如果他们因不断被求助而无法完成其他职责，就成了问题。类似例子出现在无家可归者高度集中的地区——如果社区里只有一个无家可归者，人们可能会特意帮忙，或者如果他讨钱，人们可能愿意给几美元——但如果社区里有 100 个无家可归者，平等对待他们意味着要掏出几百美元，负担更重。一旦问题变成组织规模或社会规模，聚焦个人关系就没那么合理了。前者解决办法是雇一个人（或团队）专职提供技术支持；后者需要某种社会安全网让人们不流落街头。
photochemsyn查看英文原文
Scanning through this I couldn't find much on the ratio of askers to askees (what the paper seems to call Receivers and Senders, respectively). That seems like a major factor - there's the classic example of the IT person who's constantly being asked to help with relatively basic tasks. If that's their defined job, that's not a problem - but if they have other responsibilities that are not being met due to constant requests for assistance, it becomes a problem. A similar example is found in areas with a high concentration of homeless people - i.e. if there is just one homeless person in a neighborhood, people might go out of their way to be helpful, or if they were asking for money people might be willing to give them a few dollars - but if there are 100 homeless people in a neighborhood, then treating them all equally would mean shelling out several hundred dollars, a more significant burden. Once a problem becomes organizational-scale or societal-scale, then this focus on individual relationships no longer makes much sense. In the former case, hiring a person (or team) whose sole job is to provide technical assitance is the solution; in the latter, some kind of social safety net aimed at keeping people off the street is needed.
补充引用摘要强调：多数帮助者愿意帮时仍可能没人开口，需求越大反而越怯于求助。
> 我们表明，即使大多数帮助者在得知需求后愿意帮助，不开口求助也可能发生；而且，尽管更大的需求使帮助更有价值、也更可能被给予，它却可能降低求助倾向。此外，当担心受助者羞于开口的潜在帮助者可以主动提供帮助时……
diordiderot查看英文原文
> We show that a failure to ask can occur even when most helpers would help if told about the need, and that even though a greater need makes help both more valuable and more likely to be granted, it can reduce the propensity to ask. Furthermore, when potential helpers concerned about the recipient’s ask-shyness can make spontaneous offers...
历次讨论
- 2022Hacker News 讨论帖199 分 · 94 评
同领域还值得读
一切的回报率，1870–2015
The Rate of Return on Everything, 1870–2015
利用1870–2015年多国的长期数据，估算股票、住房等各类资本的回报率，并将其与经济增长率进行比较。
经济与社会科学2019 · 487 分 · 260 评进阶 · 约 100 分钟编辑精选一切资产的回报率，1870–2015
The Rate of Return on Everything, 1870–2015
构建了 1870–2015 年 16 个国家的长周期资产回报数据集，覆盖股票、住房、政府债券和短期票据，系统比较各类资产的真实回报与波动性。
经济与社会科学2018 · 215 分 · 151 评进阶 · 约 120 分钟编辑精选一切资产的回报率，1870–2015（2019）
The Rate of Return on Everything, 1870–2015 (2019)
这篇发表于《经济学季刊》的论文构建了 1870–2015 年间 16 个主要发达国家的股票、债券、房地产等资产收益率的长周期数据库。
经济与社会科学2024 · 190 分 · 148 评进阶 · 约 80 分钟编辑精选想法是否越来越难找？
Are ideas getting harder to find?
探讨“想法是否越来越难找到”：通过衡量多个领域的“研究生产率”，发现维持相同的增长需要投入指数级增长的研究资源，即研究效率在持续下降。
经济与社会科学2016 · 182 分 · 106 评入门 · 约 60 分钟编辑精选比特币与区块链的经济极限
The Economic Limits of Bitcoin and the Blockchain
芝加哥大学 Eric Budish 的论文从经济学角度分析比特币与区块链的根本限制：核心论点是只要攻击网络（双花或砸盘做空）的收益超过挖矿成本，51% 算力攻击就有利可图，而挖矿…
经济与社会科学2018 · 176 分 · 37 评进阶 · 约 90 分钟编辑精选